All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Bookmark this article
During the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke to Francesca Gay (University of Turin, Turin, IT) and Jonathan L. Kaufman (Emory University, Atlanta, US) about the best partner for lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation.
ASH 2020 discussion: Looking for the best partner for lenalidomide maintenance after auto-SCT
In this podcast, Kaufman and Gay discuss data from studies evaluating multiple myeloma treatment with proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib or carfilzomib) + lenalidomide. Both highlight improved progression-free survival with combination therapy vs monotherapy, particularly in high-risk patients. They also discuss difficulties related to patient compliance with combination therapy and issues related to continuous hospital visits resulting from the method of administration and therefore suggest potential oral alternatives to improve compliance.
Kaufman then moves on to data from the phase II GRIFFIN trial, evaluating the addition of daratumumab (DARA) to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone induction and consolidation, followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide or DARA + lenalidomide. Gay also mentions the MAIA study evaluating DARA + lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients. Kaufman concludes by highlighting the importance of evaluating methods to shorten post-transplant maintenance time without losing any long-term benefits.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox