All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ASH 2020 discussion: Looking for the best partner for lenalidomide maintenance after auto-SCT

Featured:

Jonathan L. KaufmanJonathan L. KaufmanFrancesca GayFrancesca Gay

Feb 24, 2021


During the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke to Francesca Gay (University of Turin, Turin, IT) and Jonathan L. Kaufman (Emory University, Atlanta, US) about the best partner for lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation.

ASH 2020 discussion: Looking for the best partner for lenalidomide maintenance after auto-SCT

In this podcast, Kaufman and Gay discuss data from studies evaluating multiple myeloma treatment with proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib or carfilzomib) + lenalidomide. Both highlight improved progression-free survival with combination therapy vs monotherapy, particularly in high-risk patients. They also discuss difficulties related to patient compliance with combination therapy and issues related to continuous hospital visits resulting from the method of administration and therefore suggest potential oral alternatives to improve compliance.

Kaufman then moves on to data from the phase II GRIFFIN trial, evaluating the addition of daratumumab (DARA) to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone induction and consolidation, followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide or DARA + lenalidomide. Gay also mentions the MAIA study evaluating DARA + lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients. Kaufman concludes by highlighting the importance of evaluating methods to shorten post-transplant maintenance time without losing any long-term benefits.

Your opinion matters

Which of the following factors is most important to you when selecting a treatment for patients with multiple myeloma?