The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
During the 64th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the Multiple Myeloma Hub was pleased to speak to Bruno Paiva, University of Navarra, Pamplona, ES. We asked, What is BloodFlow and how can it improve minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in multiple myeloma?
What is BloodFlow and how can it improve MRD assessment in MM?
Paiva opens by highlighting MRD detection continuous monitoring as an unmet need for patients with multiple myeloma. BloodFlow is then outlined as a newly developed flow cytometry method to detect MRD in blood with a greater sensitivity than next-generation flow (NGF). Paiva describes how BloodFlow works using immunomagnetic enrichment of circulating plasma cells prior to NGF, as well as the range of its sensitivity (up to 10−8). The answer is closed by looking to the future of MRD assessment, including the possibility of combining different minimally invasive techniques to improve its prognostic value.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content