All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2019-03-07T12:07:53.000Z

The impact of pre-existing monoclonal gammopathy on patient outcome in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Mar 7, 2019
Share:

Bookmark this article

Multiple myeloma (MM) is consistently preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering myeloma (SMM), or solitary plasmacytoma (SPC). However, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of these pre-existing monoclonal gammopathies (MGs) on MM outcomes.

Gaurav Goyal from the Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, and his team utilized their institution’s data from 1973 to 2015 to ascertain the impact of prior known MGs on MM outcomes.

Patient population and study design

  • Patients with prior diagnosis of MGUS, SMM, or PC from 1973 to 2015 (cases) were identified from the institution’s database and compared to a known MG
  • N = 774 patients with a prior diagnosis:
  • MGUS (n = 407)
  • SMM (n = 232)
  • SPC (n = 135)
  • A control population (1:2) matched for the year of diagnosis (n = 1548)
  • Median follow-up: 81 months
  • The primary outcome was overall survival (OS)
  • Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the Log-rank test
  • Multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain factors impacting all-cause mortality
  • Descriptive statistics were depicted as medians with inter-quartile range (IQR) or frequencies
  • The median age at diagnosis of MM: 66 years (IQR 58–72)
  • The median age control cohort was 63 years (IQR 55–70)

Key findings

  • The cases showed a longer median OS than the controls (71 months vs. 56 months)
  • The improved OS was limited to those with a known prior diagnosis of SMM (80 months) and SPC (95 months), compared to MGUS (60 months)
  • Multivariable analysis revealed that MM patients with known prior MG had less overall mortality than those without, and this was limited to prior SMM/SPC group (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50–0.93), as compared to the MGUS group (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66–1.05)
  • Response to first-line treatment (VGPR) was lower in the patients with known pre-existing MGs as compared to the control group (32% vs. 41%, P = 0.03)

Dr. Goyal and his team determined that MM patients with known pre-existing MGs had superior outcome as when compared to those without. The team identified that patients with prior SMM and SPC diagnosis were associated with improved OS as compared to prior MGUS patients. The research team identified that there is a crucial need for a large prospective screening study of MGUS with a prolonged follow-up period to arrive at appropriate monitoring recommendations.

Your opinion matters

As a result of this content, I commit to reviewing the CARTITUDE clinical program to guide my understanding of cilta-cel in clinical practice.
19 votes - 12 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox