All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogenous disease that requires identification of patients with high-risk disease in order to adapt treatment strategies to improve overall outcomes. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) using 18F-deoxyfluoroglucose (FDG) has potential for being used as a staging tool for patients newly diagnosed with MM. A study by Anne-Victoire Michaud-Robert and colleagues, published in Cancers, described the use of SUVmax to quantify glucose metabolism and predict survival in patients with MM.1
This study analyzed retrospectively two large prospective phase III trials conducted in Europe: IFM2009 (NCT01191060) and EMN02/HO95 (NCT01208766). A total of 227 transplant eligible, newly diagnosed patients were included and the baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. In the EMN02/HO95 trial, treatment with an autograft was favored in 67.7% of patients whereas in IFM2009, 45.5% underwent this therapy (p < 0.001). Overall, 41.4% of patients received bortezomib.
Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics1
Characteristic |
Overall (N = 227) |
IFM2009 (n = 134) |
EMN02/HO95 (n = 93) |
|
FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IQR, interquartile range; ISS, International Staging System; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; R-ISS, revised-ISS |
||||
Median age (IQR) |
59 (53, 62) |
59 (53, 62) |
58 (52, 62) |
|
Random assignment, % |
Bortezomib intensification |
41.4 |
53.7 |
23.7 |
Autograft |
54.6 |
45.5 |
67.7 |
|
Missing data |
4.0 |
0.8 |
8.6 |
|
ISS, % |
Stage I |
45.2 |
42.5 |
48.9 |
Stage II |
39.0 |
42.5 |
34.0 |
|
Stage III |
15.8 |
14.9 |
17.0 |
|
R-ISS, % |
Stage I |
23.7 |
20.2 |
29.1 |
Stage II |
54.7 |
55.2 |
53.7 |
|
Stage III |
10.6 |
10.4 |
10.7 |
|
Missing |
11.0 |
14.2 |
6.5 |
|
LDH (U/L), median (IQR) |
231.00 (166, 337) |
211.80 (159, 327) |
263.50 (179, 365) |
|
High-risk cytogenetics by FISH, % [del(17)p, t(4;14), t(14;16)] |
14.0 |
10.7 |
18.1 |
|
β2m mg/L, median (IQR) |
3.20 (2.40, 4.45) |
3.25 (2.61, 4.48) |
3.10 (2.21, 4.38) |
All baseline FDG-PET/CT images were re-evaluated centrally for the purpose of this analysis according to the following criteria:
These criteria are similar to previously published guidelines for PET/CT in MM.2,3
Table 2. Characteristics of FDG-PET/CT parameters at baseline before harmonization1
BM, bone marrow; EMD, extramedullary disease; FLs, focal lesions; IQR, interquartile range |
|||
Baseline |
Overall |
IFM2009 |
EMN02/HO95 |
Presence of FLs, % |
72.7 |
73.9 |
70.9 |
Presence of EMD, % |
7.5 |
9.7 |
4.3 |
BM SUVmax, median (IQR) |
3.40 (2.63, 4.50) |
3.70 (2.90, 4.97) |
2.82 (2.29, 3.82) |
FLs SUVmax, median (IQR) |
5.60 (4.0, 8.5) |
5.70 (4.45, 8.45) |
5.34 (3.59, 8.56) |
Bone SUVmax, median (IQR) |
5.00 (3.45, 7.89) |
5.20 (3.8, 8.00) |
4.30 (1.06, 7.44) |
For the harmonization of data, they chose a statistical method used in radiomics called M-ComBat. Prior to this, bone marrow SUVmax (BM SUVmax) and bone SUVmax were found to be significantly different between the two studies (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively).
Univariate analysis was performed following harmonization and age (p = 0.035) and male gender (p = 0.04) were found to negatively impact PFS. The presence of EMD was a negative prognostic factor with affected patients having a median PFS of 20 months compared with 48 months in those without (p = 0.033). Autograft treatment improved PFS compared with patients who did not receive a stem cell transplant (57 months compared with 43 months; p = 0.038).
In addition, shorter PFS and OS were significantly associated with higher values of FL SUVmax and bone SUVmax. Above a threshold of 2.9 baseline FL SUVmax, PFS was reduced. For bone SUVmax, the threshold was > 3.4, as shown in Table 3. FLs, bone, and BM SUVmax over the defined threshold were significantly associated with a shorted OS. In multivariate analysis, only bone SUVmax was significantly associated with shorter OS.
Table 3. Baseline variables significantly associated with PFS and OS1
BM, bone marrow; EMD, extramedullary disease; FLs, focal lesions; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival |
||||||
|
|
Variable |
HR |
95% CI |
p-value |
|
PFS |
Univariate analysis |
Age |
1.562 |
1.031 |
2.365 |
0.035 |
Male gender |
1.478 |
1.017 |
2.148 |
0.040 |
||
Autograft arm |
0.638 |
0.475 |
0.982 |
0.039 |
||
Presence of EMD |
2.324 |
1.246 |
4.335 |
0.008 |
||
FLs SUVmax ≤ 2.9 |
0.634 |
0.424 |
0.946 |
0.026 |
||
Bone SUVmax ≤ 3.4 |
0.528 |
0.307 |
0.907 |
0.021 |
||
Multivariate analysis |
Presence of EMD |
2.510 |
1.297 |
4.869 |
0.006 |
|
Autograft arm |
0.640 |
0.442 |
0.938 |
0.022 |
||
OS |
Univariate analysis |
FLs SUVmax ≤ 6.3 |
0.501 |
0.283 |
0.887 |
0.018 |
Bone SUVmax ≤ 7.1 |
0.462 |
0.262 |
0.814 |
0.007 |
||
BM SUVmax ≤ 5.9 |
0.450 |
0.241 |
0.840 |
0.012 |
||
Multivariate analysis |
Bone SUVmax > 7.1 |
2.020 |
1.140 |
3.592 |
0.016 |
Bone SUVmax has shown to be a simple and effective tool for interpreting PET/CT and it is strongly associated with a poor prognosis in patients with MM. Both the presence of EMD and bone SUVmax were shown to be predictive of poor outcomes in patients with MM. EMD has been previously identified as a key prognostic indicator, and by using this factor alone, 17 patients were identified as being high-risk. When using bone SUVmax, however, 186 patients with high-risk disease were found. Therefore, this shows the value of the application of bone SUVmax to help staging patients and to allow for adapted treatment regimens to be used as necessary. PET/CT has the advantage of being able to identify bone and extramedullary lesions at the same time, unlike other staging methods. It should be noted that the threshold chosen for bone SUVmax of 7.1 is a higher threshold than the one that was used previously and will need to be validated in further studies.
The current Editorial Theme of the Multiple Myeloma Hub is focusing on how to identify and treat patients with high-risk MM. Read more information, here.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox