All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
Survival rates for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved over recent years due to the development of targeted therapies, stem cell transplantation, and combination approaches.1 Response to first-line treatment is one of the most important prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM).2 The relationship between depth of response and survival has previously been established, however, the impact of time to response on outcomes remains unclear.3
Dr. Nidhi Tandon, from the Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, US, and colleagues, published findings from a retrospective analysis evaluating the prognostic impact of response time in the front-line therapy setting in 2705 consecutive patients with NDMM, within 90 days of diagnosis.4 Response data after two and four cycles of front-line therapy, and overall best response were assessed in 840 patients. The primary end-point was defined as patients who achieved a very good partial response (VGPR).
In the multivariate analysis, patients were stratified by transplant status to examine the impact of response on survival following adjustment for treatment received.
The authors concluded that the results from this retrospective analysis illustrate the achievement of a deep response following first-line treatment, independent of the time to response, is prognostic for improved long-term outcomes in patients with NDMM.
References
Your opinion matters
Are you currently re-using anti-CD38 therapy in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously exposed but were not refractory to it?