All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Positive topline results from phase III GENESIS trial of motixafortide + G-CSF for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization

By Sumayya Khan

Share:

May 6, 2021


On May 4, 2021, positive topline results were announced for the phase III GENESIS trial (NCT03246529) of motixafortide (BL-8040) + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).1

Motixafortide1,2

  • A novel selective antagonist of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor, with high affinity and long receptor occupancy.
  • Method of action: CXCL12 binds to CXCR4 on HSCs, an interaction that retains HSCs in the bone marrow. Motixafortide prevents this interaction by blocking the receptor, therefore allowing mobilization of HSCs into the peripheral blood.

GENESIS trial (NCT03246529)1,3

  • A randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase III study, evaluating the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of motixafortide + G-CSF vs placebo + G-CSF for the mobilization of HSCs for ASCT in patients with MM.
  • N = 122 (randomized 2:1 to receive motixafortide + G-CSF or placebo + G-CSF).
  • Start date: December 2017.
  • Primary outcome measure: Proportion of patients mobilizing ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in up to two apheresis sessions.
  • Secondary outcome measures: Proportion of patients who collect ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in one apheresis session, proportion of patients who collect ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in one apheresis session, time to neutrophil engraftment, time to platelet engraftment, and durability of engraftment at 100 days.

Results1

Motixafortide + G-CSF demonstrated:

  • 4.9-fold increase in the proportion of patients mobilizing ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in up to two apheresis sessions compared with the control arm (70.0% vs 14.3%, respectively; 95% CI, 39.7–69.5; p < 0.0001; odds ratio [OR], 12.9).
  • 14.1-fold increase in the proportion of patients mobilizing ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in one apheresis session compared with the control arm (67.5% vs 4.8%, respectively; 95% CI, 49.5–73.8; p < 0.0001; OR, 56.0).
  • 5.6-fold increase in the median number of CD34+ cells collected on the first day of apheresis compared with the control arm (8.5 × 106 vs 1.5 × 106, respectively).
  • 8.2-fold increase in the percentage of patients that underwent transplantation after only one apheresis session compared with the control arm (88.3% vs 10.8%, respectively).

Motixafortide + G-CSF was also safe and well tolerated.

Based on these results, a new drug application is due to be submitted in the first half of 2022.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content