All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Elderly and frail patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have traditionally been excluded from clinical trials due to concerns around excessive toxicities, although real-world studies have demonstrated that increasing age and frailty should not be a barrier to effective MM treatments such as autologous stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. However, there is limited real-world evidence on bispecific antibodies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. Adegbite et al. published a retrospective analysis in Blood Advances, assessing the impact of frailty on outcomes in 102 patients with RRMM treated with B-cell maturation antigen-directed bispecific antibodies between December 2017 and August 2024 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.1 Frailty was defined using the simplified frailty index based on age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Charlson comorbidity index, and cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, treatment-related mortality, overall response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival were among the key endpoints.
|
Key learnings |
Rates of all grades of CRS (58% vs 60%; p = 0.99), ICANS (15% vs 8%; p = 0.44), and TRM (13% vs 21%; p = 0.27) were comparable between the frail vs non-frail group; rates of Grade ≥3 ICANS were also similar (3% vs 0%; p = 0.82). |
Neither best ORR (80% vs 73%; p = 0.40), median PFS (NR vs 11 months; HR, 0.50; p = 0.051), nor median OS (37 months vs 25 months; p = 0.37) were significantly different between the frail vs non-frail groups, at a median follow-up of 8.6 months. |
Patients with no prior anti-BCMA therapy had an improved PFS compared with those treated with prior anti-BCMA therapy (17 months vs 8 months; HR, 0.48; p = 0.016). |
The findings support the use of BsAb as a treatment option for older and frail patients with RRMM, although age, comorbidities, and ECOG PS should be taken into account and optimized when assessing such patients for therapy. |
BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; BsAb, bispecific antibody; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; HR, hazard ratio; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; MM, multiple myeloma; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; R/R, relapsed/refractory; RRMM, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; TRM, treatment-related mortality.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
Which of the following factors is most important to you when selecting a treatment for patients with multiple myeloma?