All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

NICE upset for ixazomib

By Fiona Chaplin

Share:

Sep 28, 2017


The latest decision from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), is an initial rejection of ixazomib, Takeda for the treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients. This follows on from a draft guidance issued in June this year, in which NICE explained that the benefits with ixazomib were not deemed to be sufficient when weighed up alongside cost-effectivity criteria.

Ixazomib is one of Takeda’s key players in its Heme-Onc portfolio and is currently approved by both the US.Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, to treat MM patients that have received one or more prior therapies. However, in clinical practice it is often given to patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) for whom other treatments have been exhausted, and is therefore a valuable option for this patient set. It also offers convenience to patients as it is an all-oral combination which can be self-administered at home. However, NICE have argued that it does not offer a cost-effective benefit over other options, a decision further supported by the fact that the Overall Survival (OS) benefit was less pronounced in later assessments. This will be disappointing news for MM patients in England and Wales, who will be hoping that Takeda can now work with NICE to overturn this initial rejection decision.

References

Your opinion matters

What is the most significant limitation you have identified when using lenalidomide or pomalidomide for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma?