TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

LocoMMotion: Final analysis at 2-year follow up

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

May 27, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, readers will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


The multiple myeloma (MM) treatment landscape is continually evolving, with several novel therapies under clinical trial. Most patients with MM experience treatment failure on initial therapy and require several further lines of therapy (LOTs), resulting in significant treatment combination heterogeneity in the real-world setting.

Here, we summarize key findings from the final analysis of the LocoMMotion study, presented by Moreau et al.1 at the 50th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), which assessed the efficacy and safety of real-life standard of care treatments for triple-class-exposed patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM).

Study design

  • LocoMMotion (NCT04035226) is a prospective, observational study conducted across multinational centers.
  • Data were collected on initial treatment, outcomes 30 days post-initial treatment, following subsequent LOT, and at a median follow-up of 26.4 months.
  • The primary focus was efficacy and safety of follow-up treatments.

Key findings

  • A total of 248 patients with heavily pre-treated RRMM were enrolled between 2019 and 2020.
  • The study identified 91 unique initial treatment regimens.
  • An overall response rate of 31.9%, with a median duration of response of 7.4 months, was observed across the entire cohort.
  • Both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were markedly poor (Figure 1).
  • Following initial therapy, 61.3% of patients went on to receive a subsequent LOT.
    • 79 unique treatment regimens were identified amongst subsequent LOTs.
  • Disease progression was notably rapid, with a median time from initial study randomization to second disease progression or death from any cause (PFS2) of 10.8 months following subsequent treatment.
  • Adverse events occurred in 86.7% of patients following initial therapy, with cytopenias being the most common.
  • The most common cause of death was disease progression, regardless of the treatment stage.

Figure 1. LocoMMotion: Progression-free and overall survival rates at 12 and 24 months*  

OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
*Data from Moreau, et al.1

Key learnings

  • Overall, the data suggest a lack of standardized care for RRMM patients, with 91 initial and 79 subsequent treatment regimens identified.
  • Survival outcomes were poor, with a 24-month PFS rate of 10.5% and OS rate of 33.7%.
  • Disease progression is often rapid and is the primary cause of death in patients with RRMM, highlighting a distinct need for improved care for heavily pretreated patients.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content