All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
The Multiple Myeloma Hub are pleased to present a series of expert interviews from the 61st American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting in Orlando, US. In this video, Luciano J. Costa, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, US, answers the question: Is autologous-allogeneic (auto-allo) superior to autologous-autologous (auto-auto) tandem transplant in multiple myeloma (MM)?
Luciano J Costa presents a pooled analysis of four large trials evaluating tandem transplant in MM in over 13,000 patients. Though there was a higher non-relapse mortality with allo-transplant, there was a lower risk of progression and survival after progression was also much higher in patients who previously received allo-transplant. Though this will likely not change the use of allo-transplant in myeloma, Dr Costa highlights that studies comparing auto and allo require long-term follow-up
Is auto-allo superior to auto-auto tandem transplant in multiple myeloma?
Your opinion matters
Which of the following factors is most important to you when selecting a treatment for patients with multiple myeloma?