All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2019-12-13T10:48:50.000Z

Is auto-allo superior to auto-auto tandem transplant in multiple myeloma?

Dec 13, 2019
Share:

Bookmark this article

The Multiple Myeloma Hub are pleased to present a series of expert interviews from the 61st American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting in Orlando, US. In this video, Luciano J. Costa, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, US, answers the question: Is autologous-allogeneic (auto-allo) superior to autologous-autologous (auto-auto) tandem transplant in multiple myeloma (MM)?

Luciano J Costa presents a pooled analysis of four large trials evaluating tandem transplant in MM in over 13,000 patients. Though there was a higher non-relapse mortality with allo-transplant, there was a lower risk of progression and survival after progression was also much higher in patients who previously received allo-transplant. Though this will likely not change the use of allo-transplant in myeloma, Dr Costa highlights that studies comparing auto and allo require long-term follow-up

Is auto-allo superior to auto-auto tandem transplant in multiple myeloma?

Your opinion matters

As a result of this content, I commit to reviewing the CARTITUDE clinical program to guide my understanding of cilta-cel in clinical practice.
28 votes - 4 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox