All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from a pooled analysis of the MASTER (NCT03224507) and MILESTONE (NCT04991103) studies in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), treated with quadruplet (QUAD) induction + autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), were published in Blood by Bal et al. The analysis evaluated the impact of translocation (t)11;14 on measurable residual disease (MRD) dynamics.
Key data: Among 302 patients included in the analysis, 16% were t(11;14)+ and 84% were t(11;14)−. MRD negativity, at a sensitivity of 10⁻⁵, following induction was 9% in t(11;14)+ and 31% in t(11;14)− patients (p < 0.001), increasing to 36% vs 59% after ASCT (p = 0.004), and to 53% vs 75% at any time on treatment (p = 0.004). Rates of sustained MRD negativity were comparable between groups (38% vs 46%; p = 0.43). Median time to MRD negativity (<10⁻⁵) was longer in t(11;14)+ patients (13.6 months vs 7.7 months; p = 0.002). Four-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 90% vs 72% in patients who were t(11;14)+ and t(11;14)−, respectively (p = 0.012).
Key learning: Despite slower MRD clearance, patients with t(11;14)+ NDMM treated with QUAD induction and ASCT experienced comparable sustained MRD negativity to patients with t(11;14)− NDMM and improved PFS, indicating a favorable prognosis.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
On average, how many patients with MGUS/smoldering MM do you see in a month?