All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2022-08-16T12:26:54.000Z

Identifying and managing ocular toxicities in patients with MM

Aug 16, 2022
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall the different ocular toxicities reported with anti-myeloma agents and how to identify them.

Bookmark this article

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most prevalent hematologic cancer with a vast majority of patients requiring subsequent lines of therapy, leading to limited treatment options. Ocular toxicities are common adverse events (AEs) associated with molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies, as many of the essential signaling molecules that drive cancer growth are also expressed in ocular tissues.

An unprecedented case of transient myopic shift induced by daratumumab was reported in 2019 and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated the drug label for daratumumab in 2021 to include ocular toxicity.1 With the advent of many novel therapies, the complexity of ocular pathology and understanding around ophthalmologic AEs occurring due to targeted therapies is important for the management of ocular toxicities in patients with MM.

During the 3rd European Myeloma Network Meeting, Marc Labetoulle discussed the early recognition and management of ocular toxicity to improve patient outcomes.2 Here, we present a summary of the ocular toxicities associated MM including recommendations for early detection and clinical management.

Ocular AEs associated with MM therapies

There are a range of ocular toxicities (Table 1) associated with both conventional chemotherapeutic agents as well as more recent agents such as belantamab mafodotin (belamaf), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) approved by FDA in 2020 for the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM. Figure 1 shows how specific MM drugs lead to ocular toxicities affecting different parts of the eye.

Table 1. Ocular AEs with MM therapies*

Drug class

Main side effects

Others

Alkylating agent

Cyclophosphamide

Blurred vision

Visual impairment

Conjunctivitis

Eye oedema

Lacrimation increased

Carmustine

Ocular toxicities

Transient conjunctival flushing and blurred vision

Retinal hemorrhages

Neuroretinitis

Proteasome inhibitor

Bortezomib

Eye swelling

Vision abnormal

Conjunctivitis

Eye hemorrhage

Eyelid infection

Eye inflammation

Chalazion

Blepharitis

Diplopia

Dry eye

Eye irritation

Eye pain

Lacrimation increased

Eye discharge

Corneal lesion

Exophthalmos

Retinitis

Scotoma

Eye disorder (including eyelid) NOS

Dacryoadenitis acquired

Photophobia

Photopsia

Optic neuropathy§

Different degrees of visual impairment (up to blindness) §

 

BCMA-targeted ADC

Belantamab mafodotin

Keratopathy

Microcyst-like epithelial changes

Changes in visual acuity

Blurred vision events

Dry eye events#

Photophobia

Eye irritation

Ulcerative keratitis

Infective keratitis

MEDI2228

Photophobia

 

CD138-targeted ADC

Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062)

Dry eye

Lacrimation increased

Vision blurred

Angle closure

Cataract

Cystoid macular edema

ADC, antibody-drug conjugate, AE, adverse event; BCMA, B cell maturation antigen; CD, cluster of differentiation; NOS, not otherwise specified; MM, multiple myeloma.
*Adapted from Labetoulle M.2
Allergic reaction.
Grouping of >1 Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred term.
§
Post-marketing adverse event regardless of indication.
Based on eye examination, characterized by corneal epithelium changes with or without symptoms.
Includes diplopia, blurred vision, reduced visual acuity, and visual impairment.
#
Includes dry eye, ocular discomfort, and eye pruritus.

Figure 1. Ocular toxicities associated with MM therapies and anatomy of the eye*

ADC, antibody-drug conjugate; BCMA, B-cell maturation agent; MEC, microcyst-like epithelial change; MM, multiple myeloma.
*Created with BioRender.com.

Mechanism of action

ADCs can reach the cornea either through the tear film or the vascularized area of the limbus, and may cause ocular toxicity either via on- or off-target processes. On-target ocular toxicity is caused by non-cancerous cells expressing the target antigen, binding of the monoclonal antibody leads to the release of the cytotoxic drug (such monomethyl auristatin F and ravtansine). Off-target ocular toxicity results from proteases, esterases, and other blood enzymes inducing premature deconjugation of the drug, leading to endocytosis and pinocytosis; this exposes neighboring cells to cytotoxicity.

Belamaf

For belamaf, ocular toxicity may occur via macropinocytosis by corneal epithelial cells. Epithelial stem cells can internalize the ADCs, causing cytotoxicity, and their migration to the cornea leads to keratopathy and blurred vision. Some ADCs, such as trastuzumab, may also have an on-target mechanism and cause ocular lesions similar to belamaf.

Ocular toxicity associated with belamaf can be observed by slit lamp microscopy to identify superficial punctate keratopathy, microcyst-like epithelial changes and whorl-like keratopathy. The ocular lesions are diffuse and presented bilaterally, with patients reporting blurred or decreased vision and dry eye. Other tools used to measure structural changes in the corneal epithelium include:

  • optical coherence tomography
  • in-vivo confocal microscopy

Changes in the corneal epithelial thickness may cause refractive shifts (myopic or hyperopic) as well as changes in the corneal curvature. The DREAMM-2 trial (NCT03525678) showed that ocular AEs associated with belamaf were frequent, with keratopathy observed in >70% of patients; however, only 18% of patients showed best corrected visual acuity change to 20/50 or worse. In total, 3% of patients discontinued the study due to corneal events. Belamaf ocular toxicity is managed either by dose delays, dose reduction, or discontinuation. Table 2 shows the incidence of keratopathy and treatment changes in the DREAMM 1, 2, and 6 trials investigating belamaf.

Table 2. Treatment changes due to ocular toxicity in DREAMM (1, 2, and 6)*

 

DREAMM-1 (NCT02064387)

DREAMM-2 (NCT03525678)

DREAMM-6 (NCT03544281)

Incidence of keratopathy

69

70

100

Median time to onset of keratopathy (range), days

23 (1–84)

36 (19–143)

NA

Median time to resolution of keratopathy (range), days

35 (5–442)

71 (57–99)

NA

Treatment gap

49

47

83

Dose reduction

46

23

39

Discontinuation of treatment

2.9

1

0

NA, not applicable.
*Adapted from Wahab, et al.3

Ocular AEs grading scale

Based on the corneal epithelial thickness and location of the cyst, the ocular AEs can be graded as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Ocular AEs grading scale*

Ophthalmic assessment

Changes in visual acuity from baseline

Change in corneal epithelium

Complementary objective criteria

Recommendation

No ocular AEs

No change

No

No

Continue treatment at current dose

Mild ocular AE

Decline of 1 line

Mild superficial punctate keratopathy

Density: non-confluent

 

Location: predominantly (≥80%) peripheral

 

Microcyst: few if any

Continue treatment at current dose

Moderate ocular AE

Decline of 2 or 3 lines (and not worse than 20/200)

Moderate superficial keratopathy with or without MECs, sub-epithelial haze (peripheral), or

new peripheral stromal opacity

Density: semi-confluent

 

Location: predominantly (≥80%) paracentral

Withhold treatment until examination findings improve or BCVA reaches mild severity or better

 

Consider resuming treatment at a reduced dose of 1.9 mg/kg2

Severe ocular AE

Decline > 3 lines

Several superficial keratopathy involving central cornea

Corneal epithelial defect

Density: confluent

 

Location: predominantly (≥80%) central

Withhold treatment until examination findings improve or BCVA reaches mild severity or better

 

For worsening symptoms consider treatment discontinuation

AE, adverse event; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; MEC, microcyst-like epithelial change.
*Adapted from Labetoulle M.2

Management

The following recommendations can be made for the clinical management and advise to patients to reduce the frequency of ocular AEs and increase the tolerance to the antimyeloma drugs.

  • Use of keratopathy and visual acuity scale to decide future treatments of belamaf
  • Recommend to patients not missing any planned ophthalmic examinations (at baseline, before subsequent three treatment cycles, and in case any symptoms occur during treatment)
  • Prescribe preservative free lubricant eye drops to begin from Day 1 of Cycle 1 until the end of the treatment
  • Advise using cooling eye mask during drug infusion
  • Preservative free and low-grade steroid eye drops may be useful in short term pulses to relieve side effects
  • Educate patients to declare any new ocular symptoms that may occur during treatment
  • Advise patients to pay attention when driving or operating machines
  • Avoid contact lenses until the end of the treatment

Conclusion

The ocular surface is prone to AEs during the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory MM with ADC’s and, while these AEs are not severe, they are a common occurrence in many patients. The frequency of ocular AEs can be reduced by educating patients in the self-management of their symptoms and the early identification of any signs, educating physicians on the management of ocular toxicities, and planning regular check-up visits appropriately. In addition, drug developers and medical professionals should be aware of these possible ocular toxicities, facilitating early recognition and intervention in both preclinical and clinical settings.

  1. Mavrommatis MA, Jung H, Chari A, et al. Daratumumab-induced transient myopic shift. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2019;13:116-118. DOI: 1016/j.ajoc.2018.12.017
  2. Labetoulle M. Early management of ADC-related ocular disorders in Multiple Myeloma. 3rd European Myeloma Network Meeting. April 8, 2022; Virtual.
  3. Wahab A, Rafae A, Mushtaq K, et al. Ocular toxicity of belantamab mafodotin, an oncological perspective of management in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma . Front Oncol. 2021;11:678634. DOI: 3389/fonc.2021.678634

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox