All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
With improved treatment options for patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM), a greater number are achieving a complete response (CR). Measurements of M-protein have enabled doctors to follow CR and subsequent progression, but many of the earlier techniques lack sensitivity. Consequently, there has been a move towards measurement of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) from bone marrow (BM) aspirates, using either flow cytometry or molecular based methods. MRD measurements from the BM are > 3 times more sensitive than serum measurements and correlate with progression free survival (PFS), although many MRD-negative patients do still progress. However, BM techniques are expensive, time-consuming and uncomfortable for the patient. Therefore, the development of more sensitive serum-based methods that correlate with stringent CR (sCR) would be beneficial.
In a study carried out by researchers at the Department of Pathology and Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA, and published in Blood Cancer Journal, the sensitivity of monoclonal Ig Rapid Accurate Mass Measurements (miRAMM) was tested using serum from MM patients that had achieved a sCR post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This method uses the identification of M-protein from the accurate molecular mass of the light chain component and could be adapted easily for clinical testing.
This method offers a serum test to measure serum M-proteins, with improved sensitivity over other methods in terms of both cost and ease of use. With such a small sample set in this study, conclusions are limited, but initial data suggests that measurements are indicative of sCR and could be used for meaningful tracking of treatment responses over time.
We assessed the ability of a mass spectrometry-based technique, called monoclonal immunoglobulin rapid accurate mass measurement (miRAMM), to extend the analytical range of M-protein detection in serum samples obtained from myeloma patients in stringent complete response (sCR) post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). To aid the M-protein detection post ASCT, the accurate molecular mass of the M-protein light chain at diagnosis was determined in all patients (N=30) and used to positively identify clones in the sCR serum. Day 100 post-ASCT, sCR samples had miRAMM identifiable M-proteins in 81% of patients. Patients who had achieved only a partial remission (PR) pre-ASCT and those with IgG isotypes serum samples had the highest rate of M-protein detection by miRAMM. miRAMM positivity at single time points (day 100, 6 months or 12 months) did not correlate with progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, sCR patients who did not decrease their miRAMM M-protein intensities in serial measurements had shorter PFS than those whose miRAMM intensities decreased (median 17.9 months vs 51.6 months; P<0.0017). miRAMM M-protein is a more sensitive blood-based test than traditional M-protein tests and could cost effectively aid in serially monitoring complete remission for continue response or biochemical relapse.
References
Your opinion matters
Are you currently re-using anti-CD38 therapy in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously exposed but were not refractory to it?