All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
Results from the CLOVER-1 phase II trial (NCT02952508), investigating the efficacy of CLR 131 for the treatment of patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM), showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 40% in triple-class refractory patients that received a total dose of ≥ 60 mCi.1 These patients were refractory to proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 antibodies, and immunomodulatory agents. This ORR was seen in 6 of 15 patients, from both Part A of this trial (a dose exploration) and Part B — triple-class refractory patients enrolled between March 2020 and May 2020. CLR 131 was reported to be well tolerated, and the most frequent adverse event was cytopenia. No unexpected adverse events were recorded.
This report follows the results that were announced from the phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT02278315) earlier this year.2 Patients with MM who had been treated with a median of five lines of previous therapies (range, 3−17) were included in this study and achieved an ORR of 34.5%. Over half of the patients included (51%) were quad-refractory or greater. Patients were treated with three doses of CLR 131: < 50 mCi, ~ 50 mCi, or ~ 75 mCi. Hematological toxicities were the most common Grade ≥ 3 events that occurred at the highest dose level. These included thrombocytopenia (65%), neutropenia (41%), leukopenia (30%), anemia (24%), and lymphopenia (35%).
CLR 131 is a small-molecule phospholipid ether–drug conjugate that takes advantage of the uptake of phospholipid ethers by malignant cells, in order to deliver a cytotoxic radioisotope (iodine-131) selectively. CLR 131 received fast-track designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last year, as reported by the Multiple Myeloma Hub here. This was followed by the announcement of an orphan drug designation from the European Commission for CLR 131 in MM.3 CLR 131 is also being investigated in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, and other selected B-cell malignancies.1
Watch Sikander Ailawadhi discuss CLR 131 at ASH 2019
Could radiotherapeutic approaches be a promising new treatment option for myeloma?
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
Are you currently re-using anti-CD38 therapy in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously exposed but were not refractory to it?