All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2021-12-09T15:05:51.000Z

Could CTCs and tumor DNA be more sensitive than a BM aspirate to assess treatment response in MM?

Bookmark this article

During the 63rd ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, the Multiple Myeloma Hub was pleased to speak to Bruno Paiva, University of Navarra, Pamplona, ES. We asked, could circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and tumor DNA be more sensitive than a bone marrow (BM) aspirate to assess treatment response in MM?

Could CTCs and tumor DNA be more sensitive than a BM aspirate to assess treatment response in MM?

In this video, Paiva discusses the importance of assessing treatment efficacy in myeloma. He also mentions minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments, next-generation sequencing (NGS) and next-generation flow (NGF).

 

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox