All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Clinical experience with belantamab mafodotin: Management strategies for ocular toxicity

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

Featured:

Rakesh PopatRakesh Popat

Oct 22, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able state the strategies for managing ocular toxicity associated with belantamab mafodotin for the treatment of MM.


Do you know... Which of the following is NOT an example of a strategy for managing ocular toxicity associated with belantamab mafodotin treatment?

The Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke with Rakesh Popat, University College Hospital, London, UK. We asked about clinical experience with belantamab mafodotin, with a focus on strategies for managing ocular toxicity.

During this interview, Popat discussed clinical experience using belantamab mafodotin for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), highlighting its mechanism as a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed antibody–drug conjugate and the practical management of associated ocular toxicities. Popat emphasized key considerations in patient selection, treatment sequencing, and individualized dosing strategies to optimize outcomes while minimizing adverse events. The discussion also covered real-world approaches to monitoring, dose adjustment, and maintaining long-term treatment benefit without compromising safety or efficacy.

Clinical experience with belantamab mafodotin: Management strategies for ocular toxicity

Key takeaways

  • Belantamab mafodotin is a BCMA-directed antibody–drug conjugate that provides a treatment option for patients with RRMM.

  • Sequencing of BCMA-targeted therapies should be based on overall treatment goals and patient eligibility for CAR T-cell therapy, which may be prioritized when available.

  • Ocular toxicity is the most common adverse event associated with belantamab mafodotin, typically presenting as blurred vision or a gritty sensation within 2–3 weeks following infusion; it is generally transient.

  • Regular ophthalmic assessments, especially before the first four treatment infusions, are recommended to monitor for corneal changes and guide dosing.

  • Management of ocular events includes pausing treatment until symptoms resolve, adjusting the dose, or extending dosing intervals to allow ocular recovery.

  • After initial treatment cycles, treatment decisions can be guided by patient-reported symptoms such as visual discomfort or blurring.

  • Although the approved dosing schedule is every 3 weeks, many patients benefit from extended intervals ranging from 4 to 12 weeks, depending on disease aggressiveness and tolerance.

  • Initiating treatment at 2.5 mg/kg with early reduction to 1.9 mg/kg can help balance disease control with reduced ocular toxicity.

  • Further adjustments, including extending dosing intervals to 8 or 12 weeks, or reducing the dose to 1.4 mg/kg, can minimize toxicity while maintaining efficacy.

  • As shown by data from the DREAMM-8 (NCT04484623) trial, interruption of, or spacing, belantamab mafodotin doses does not negatively impact treatment efficacy.1

  • Patients who experience disease progression typically do so because of underlying disease biology rather than treatment interruption.

  • Proactively increasing dose intervals from the outset can help prevent severe ocular events and extended treatment delays.

  • Over time, spacing infusions to every 3–6 months in patients with good responses can support durable remission and improved tolerability.

This educational resource is independently supported by GSK. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following reflects your thoughts about the feasibility of nursing staff preparing oncology treatments at the bedside at your clinical practice site, as opposed to in the pharmacy?