All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2019-06-13T09:35:01.000Z

ASCO 2019 | AMG 420 first-in-human phase I dose escalation study results

Jun 13, 2019
Share:

Bookmark this article

On Sunday 2 June, 2019, Professor Max Topp, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, DE, presented the results of the phase I trial of AMG 420 (BI 836909) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), at the annual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, in Chicago, US.

Background

AMG 420 is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that binds to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on tumor/plasma cells, and CD3 on T-cells. This dual action leads to T-cell mediated lysis of BCMA+ cells.

Study design and patient characteristics (NCT02514239)

  • Patients with RRMM who have received 2 or more prior lines of therapy including ≥1 proteasome inhibitor (PI) and ≥1 immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)
    • Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant was an exclusion criteria
    • Characteristics shown in Table 1
  • Endpoints:
    • Primary: Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)
    • Secondary: Response including minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity defined as <1 tumor cell per 104 normal cells in bone marrow by flow cytometry
  • AMG 420 administered by continuous infusion in 6-week cycles for up to 10 cycles
    • Initial single patient cohorts dosed at: 0.2–1.6μg/day
    • Subsequent, three to six patient cohorts dosed at: 3.2–800μg/day
  • Given for ≤5 cycles or until disease progression (PD), toxicity or consent being withdrawn
  • Five further cycles, up to a total of 10, could be given dependent upon response:
    • Cycle 1: 4 weeks of AMG 420
      • ≤4 days in clinic
    • Cycle 2: 4 weeks of AMG 420
      • ≤24 hours in clinic
    • Cycle 3 onwards (up to 10): 4 weeks of AMG 420
      • ≤8 hours in clinic
    • There was a treatment-free period of 2 weeks between cycles
    • Safety follow-up visit 30-days after end of treatment

Table 1: Patient characteristics

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IMid, immunomodulatory drugs; PI, proteosome inhibitor

 

N= 42

Median age (year)

65 (39–79)

ECOG status (0 vs 1 vs 2)

57% vs 40% vs 2%

Cytogenetics (standard vs intermediate vs high)

55% vs 31% vs 14%

Median prior lines of therapy

4 (2–13)

Prior monoclonal antibody (daratumumab vs elotuzumab)

26% vs 10%

Refractory to monoclonal antibody (daratumumab vs elotuzumab)

21% vs 10%

Refractory to IMid/PI/IMid and PI

55% vs 45% vs 31%

Primary endpoints: DLTs and MTD

Table 2 shows a summary of the three grade 3 DLTs that occurred. The MTD was determined to be 400μg/day. No anti-AMG 420 antibodies were detected up to 800μg/day.

Table 2: Summary of grade 3 DLTs

 

DLT

Dose of AMG 420

Timing of DLT

Notes

1

CRS

800μg/day

1 day after treatment start. Resolved after AMG 420 was discontinued

Symptoms; fever, hypertension, tachycardia and retrograde amnesia

2

Peripheral PN

800μg/day

1 week after treatment start, required hospitalization by day 14

 

M protein decreased by 58% after 15 days of treatment. PN resolved with IV Ig and corticosteroid

3

PN

400μg/day

Grade 1 PN developed to grade 3 by day 30 and improved to baseline by day 84

M protein decreased by 79% after 28 days of treatment. PN resolved with IV Ig and corticosteroid

CRS, cytokine relase syndrome; DLT, dose-limiting toxicities; PN, polyneuropathy

CRS adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs)

The safety data for CRS, SAEs and treatment-related SAEs is shown in Table 3. Of the two patients who died of infection, one died of aspergillosis/flu and one died of fulminant hepatitis related to adenovirus infection. Neither were deemed to be treatment-related.

Of the 19 patients (45%) experiencing a SAE, 16 were hospitalized, 4 for a prolonged period. No grade 3–4 central nervous system toxicities were observed.

Table 3: CRS, SAEs and treatment-related SAEs grade 1–5 (N= 42)

CRS, cytokine relase syndrome; PN, polyneuropathy; SAEs, serious adverse events

Grade

Total

1

2

3

4

5

CRS

16 (38%)

13

2

1

-

-

SAEs (≥2 patients)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Infections

13 (31%)

-

3

8

-

2

PN

2 (5%)

-

-

2

-

-

Treatment-related SAEs

 

 

 

 

 

 

PN

2 (5%)

-

-

2

-

-

Edema

1 (2%)

-

-

1

-

-

Discontinuations

Currently, two patients remain on therapy, with the remainder having discontinued for the following reasons; PD (n= 25, 60%), AEs (n= 7, 17%), death (n= 4, 10%), completion of 10 cycles (n= 3, 7%), and withdrawal of consent (n= 1, 2%). Deaths were attributable to disease progression (n= 2) and AEs (n= 2).

Efficacy

At a dose of 400μg/day (n= 10), 5 MRD negative complete responses (CRs) were seen, with 1 very good partial response (VGPR) and 1 partial response (PR) giving a response rate of 70%, lasting for a median of 9.0 months (5.8–13.6).

In total, 13 patients responded (13/42), with a median time to response of 1 month, lasting for 8.4 months on average (2.5–15.5). MRD negative CRs lasted for a median of 9.6 months (2.8–12.8), with 5 of these patients in the 400μg/day cohort. Aside from the patients whose last response at evaluation was PD (n= 5), all patients were responding.

Responses at doses less than 200μg/day were:

  • Three patients responded at doses of:
    • 5μg/day, completed full 10 cycles
      • Best response: CR in cycle 8
    • 50μg/day, completed full 10 cycles
      • Best response: PR in cycles 2–5
    • 100μg/day, discontinued due to PD having received 8 cycles
      • Best response: CR in cycles 4–5
  • Responses at doses ≥200μg/day are shown in Table 4

Table 4: Characteristics of responding patients at doses ≥200μg/day

CR, complete response; EOT; end of treatment, N/A; patient received 10 cycles or treatment ongoing as of April 2019 (maximum); MRD, minimum measurable disease; PD, progressive disease; PN, polyneuropathy; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response

Dose (μg/day)

Number of cycles to response

Prior lines of therapy

Reason for discontinuation

Best response

Cycle of best response

200

4

6

Port infection

MRD- CR

3–4 to 11 months post-treatment

400

7

3

N/A

MRD- CR

3–7

400

10

4

N/A

MRD- CR

3–10

400

8

6

PD

MRD- CR

1–7

400

10

2

N/A

MRD- CR

1–10

400

5

5

PD

MRD- CR

3–4

400

1

5

PN

VGPR

From EOT to 7 months post-EOT

400

1

5

Death

PR

1

800

400 (dose reduction)

2

1

5

Withdrew consent

VGPR

2–3

800

0.5

5

PN

PR and CR

PR in 1, CR 9 months post-EOT

Conclusion

AMG 420 demonstrates activity in a heavily pre-treated population with RRMM who had received, on average, 4 prior lines of therapy. At the MTD of 400μg/day there was a 70% response rate, with 5 patients achieving MRD negative CR. No major toxicities were reported in the dose escalation portion of the study, subsequently DLTs were experienced by three patients. In addition, 13 (31%) patients experienced infections, 10 of which were grade 3 or above. Professor Topp suggested that future clinical trials of AMG 420 should thoroughly evaluate infection risk in order to best inform AE management guidelines. A phase Ib/II trial is ongoing.

  1. Topp M. et al. Evaluation of AMG 420, an anti-BCMA bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) immunotherapy, in R/R multiple myeloma (MM) patients: Updated results of a first-in-human (FIH) phase I dose escalation study. Abstract #8007. American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting, Chicago, US. 2019 Jun 02.

Your opinion matters

As a result of this content, I commit to reviewing the CARTITUDE clinical program to guide my understanding of cilta-cel in clinical practice.
27 votes - 6 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox