The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
The results of this trial were presented by Maxime Chénard-Poirier from the Royal Marsden Hospital in London in an oral abstract session at ASCO 2017 Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois. This presentation was part of the ‘Developmental Therapeutics - Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics’ session on Saturday June 4th, 2017.
CH5126766 is a first-in-class MEK inhibitor, with a long half-life (an average of 60 hours). Based on this extended half-life, dosing frequencies of two or three times weekly were studied in a dose escalation trial of 22 patients. However, the maximum tolerated dose and frequency was 4 mg two times per week. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) included rash, CK elevation, blurred vision, diarrhea, mucositis, fatigue and nausea. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicity was skin rash, which was managed with topical treatment.
This agent shows much promise for treatment of many malignancies, including myeloma, since approximately 20% of myeloma patients are positive for KRAS and NRAS mutations. In-vitro, MEK inhibitors are active against myeloma cell lines regardless of RAS status.
In summary, twice weekly scheduling is well-tolerated. Preliminary results suggest single agent MEK inhibition may have activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
References